Hi Jame, preserve order in index fields:
if you don't want to use phrase queries in key or value this order is "position". if you use phrase queries but no value has more then 50 Tokens you also could use position and start each pair with position 100, 200, 300 ... Otherwise you could use payloads. Imho there is no standard way to connect the positions of two fields. You have to write your own Query. My Tip: Take org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TermSpans as starting point and use the queryparser-Module. btw: normaly there is a standard solution in lucene for each problem. So please tell more about your use-case and somebody will have an answer without "program by your own". Best regards Karsten -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:53:26 +0530 > Von: jame vaalet <jamevaa...@gmail.com> > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: indexing key value pair into lucene solr index > thanks karsten. > can we preserve order within index field ? if yes, i can index them > separately and map them using their order. > > On 24 October 2011 17:32, <karsten-s...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > Hi Jame, > > > > you can > > - generate one token for each pair (key, value) --> key_value > > - insert a gap between each pair and us phrase queries > > - use key as field-name (if you have a restricted set of keys) > > - wait for joins in Solr 4.0 (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join) > > - use position or payloads to connect key and value > > - tell the forum your exact use-case with examples > > > > Best regrads > > Karsten > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > Datum: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:11:49 +0530 > > > Von: jame vaalet <jamevaa...@gmail.com> > > > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > Betreff: indexing key value pair into lucene solr index > > > > > hi, > > > in my use case i have list of key value pairs in each document object, > if > > > i > > > index them as separate index fields then in the result doc object i > will > > > get > > > two arrays corresponding to my keys and values. The problem i face > here > > is > > > that there wont be any mapping between those keys and values. > > > > > > do we have any easy to index these data in solr ? thanks in advance > ... > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -JAME > > > > > > -- > > -JAME
