Hi Erick, thanks for your quick response. I've analyzed it and i've already thought the same.
This are the JIRA-Issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-219 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438 Both are still open. I think i wait 1-2 months. Then i write a custom component:) Regards Vadim 2011/10/13 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > Wildcard queries are NOT analyzed. So the fact that your > queries that are identical except for case produce different > result sets is expected behavior. I believe there's a JIRA to > allow limited analysis of wildcard queries, but I confess I > don't know what the status of it is. > > You'll have to do whatever normalization you need to do at > the app level before you pass the query on to Solr or write a > custom component to deal with this case I think. > > Best > Erick > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Vadim Kisselmann > <v.kisselm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > my wildcard-search shows strange behavior. > > Sometimes i have results, sometimes not. > > > > I use the last nightly build(Solr 4.0, Build #1643) > > > > I use this filters and tokenizers to "index": > > WhitespaceTokenizer > > WoldDelimiterFilter > > LowerCaseFilter > > RemoveDuplicateTokenFilter > > ReversedWildcardFilter > > > > This one for "query": > > WhitespaceTokenizer > > WoldDelimiterFilter > > LowerCaseFilter > > RemoDuplicatesTokenFilter > > > > This is my search-text: > > http://www.redakteur.eu/?p=89025 > > > > And my words: > > > > Schnelle DNA-Analyse führt zu taktischen Vorsprüngen im Gefechtseinsatz > > *DNA-Analyse AND Gefechtseinsatz* > > > > Behavior and Query: > > > > DNA-Analyse AND Gefechtseinsatz (1 MATCH) > > DNA-Analyse AND Gefechts* (1 MATCH) > > DNA-Analyse AND ge* (1 MATCH) > > > > DNA* (0 MATCHES) > > dna* (6 MATCHES) > > > > Gefechts* (0 MATCHES) > > gefecht* (6 MATCHES) > > > > *seinsatz (1 MATCH) > > *NA-Analyse (0 MATCHES) > > *na-Analyse (0 MATCHES) > > *na-analyse (0 MATCHES) > > > > Which filters can help me to match this one result with > standard-wildquery > > und reversed-wildquery? > > > > Thanks and regards > > Vadim > > >
