Thanks, as a general rule a would totally agree, however the way we are using solr we don't want to be attach to any particular schema, we just want it to work with whatever the default is... but I will keep your suggestion in mind in the future
thanks everyone.. you guys are always very helpful On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter-3 [via Lucene] < ml-node+s472066n3411231...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > > : I figure it out.. thanks for pointing me in the right direction... so at > the > : end solr field type text was changed for text_general > > they key take away here seems to be that when you upgraded from Solr 3.3 > to Solr 3.4 you stoped using your old schema (which you copied from the > 3.3 example), and started using the example schema from 3.4 -- which was > different. > > This is not a good idea in general -- if you build an index with a > specific set of configs, you should *not* change those configs just > because you upgrade solr -- quite hte opposite, you should > absolutely continue using your old configs when you upgrade the Solr > application. > > There may be new recomendations in the new example configs that you want > to read/consider, and by all means if you are building a *new* index > consider using the new example configs as your starting point -- but under > no circumstances should you blindly replace your existing (working) > config files with the example from a new version of Solr just because you > upgrade. > > > -Hoss > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/schema-changes-changes-3-3-to-3-4-tp3391019p3411231.html > To unsubscribe from schema changes changes 3.3 to 3.4?, click > here<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3391019&code=amFpcm8ub3J0aXpAZmlybWV4LmNvbXwzMzkxMDE5fDcwMjU4NDMxNQ==>. > > -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/schema-changes-changes-3-3-to-3-4-tp3391019p3412542.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
