Hi Ludovic, I'm not sure to understand which piece of my schema expose the analyzer so you will find my schema here https://github.com/lbdremy/solr-install/blob/master/conf/schema.xml. Hope this will be helpfull :) The merchant_name_t is a dynamic field matching the "*_t" pattern so this field is indexed and the type is "text_general".
When I said "it should return more than that", I mean the result send by solr contains 166 groups(=merchants) and it should return more than 166 groups(merchants). For example the merchant "Cult Beauty Ltd." doesn't not appear in the result and others merchants don't begin by "Cult", so where this merchant is grouped? Thank you very much for your help Ludovic. Rémy, On 28 September 2011 15:52, lboutros <boutr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Remy, > > could you paste the analyzer part of the field merchant_name_t please ? > > And when you say "it should return more than that", could you explain why > with examples ? > > If I'm not wrong, the field collapsing function is based on indexed values, > so if your analyzer is complex (not "string"), > > "Rémy Loubradou" can be indexed as "remy" and "loubradou". > > And "Rémy NotLoubradou" could be grouped with "Rémy Loubradou". > > This could explain the behavior. > > Ludovic. > > > ----- > Jouve > France. > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FieldCollapsing-don-t-return-every-groups-tp3376036p3376089.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
