Agreed, but I'd rather see hammering on latest code <G>....
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, the more hammering on trunk the better! > > > On Sep 24, 2011, at 13:31 , Erick Erickson wrote: > >> Hmmm, why are you doing this? Why not use the latest >> successful trunk build? >> >> You can get a series of built artifacts at: >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Solr/job/Solr-trunk/ >> but I'm not sure how far back they go. How are you getting >> the trunk source code? And *how* don't they build? >> >> But I really question how useful this is unless it's curiosity, >> since none of the trunk builds will be officially supported >> until the release... >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Jason Toy <jason...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, I am testing various versions of solr from trunk, I am finding that >>> often times the example doesn't build and I can't test out the version. Is >>> there a resource that shows which versions build correctly so that we can >>> test it out? >>> > >
