No probs. I would still hope someone would comment on you thread with some expert opinions about making a copy of a copy :)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Tanner Postert <[email protected]> wrote: > sure enough that worked. could have sworn we had it this way before, but > either way, that fixed it. Thanks. > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Tanner Postert > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> i believe that was the original configuration, but I can switch it back and >> see if that yields any results. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Pulkit Singhal >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I am NOT claiming that making a copy of a copy field is wrong or leads >>> to a race condition. I don't know that. BUT did you try to copy into >>> the text field directly from the genre field? Instead of the >>> genre_search field? Did that yield working queries? >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Tanner Postert >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > i have 3 fields that I am working with: genre, genre_search and text. >>> genre >>> > is a string field which comes from the data source. genre_search is a >>> text >>> > field that is copied from genre, and text is a text field that is copied >>> > from genre_search and a few other fields. Text field is the default >>> search >>> > field for queries. When I search for q=genre_search:indie+rock, solr >>> returns >>> > several records that have both Indie as a genre and Rock as a genre, >>> which >>> > is great, but when I search for q=indie+rock or q=text:indie+rock, i get >>> no >>> > results. >>> > >>> > Why would the source field return the value and the destination >>> wouldn't. >>> > Both genre_search and text are the same data type, so there shouldn't be >>> any >>> > strange translations happening. >>> > >>> >> >> >
