In our case it's clearly the wrong tradeoff :) I'm going to patch our Solr for now, but either
- a config option - a facet.whatever param - or reversing the tradeoff should be done in my eyes. Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 um 22:34 schrieb Yonik Seeley: > So this is bad if you have a high facet.limit, but really few actual matches. > It may be better for large base docsets that match a lot of facet > values (but in that case, one would expect to see few zeros anyway). > So perhaps using 0 as the mincount isn't the right tradeoff?
