So if I understand you, you are using Tika /SolrJ together in a Solr client process which talks to your Solr server ? What is the heap size ? Can you give us a stack trace from the OOM exception ?
-Simon On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Tirthankar Chatterjee < tchatter...@commvault.com> wrote: > I am using 64 bit JVM and we are going out of memory in extraction phase > where TIKA assigns the content after extracting to SOLRInputDocument in the > pipeline which gets loaded in memory. > > We are using released 3.1 version of SOLR. > > Thanks, > Tirthankar > > -----Original Message----- > From: simon [mailto:mtnes...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:23 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Document Size for Indexing > > what issues exactly ? > > are you using 32 bit Java ? That will restrict the JVM heap size to 2GB > max. > > -Simon > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Tirthankar Chatterjee < > tchatter...@commvault.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a machine (win 2008R2) with 16GB RAM, I am having issue > > indexing 1/2GB files. How do we avoid creating a SOLRInputDocument or > > is there any way to directly use Lucene Index writer classes. > > > > What would be the best approach. We need some suggestions. > > > > Thanks, > > Tirthankar > > > > > > ******************Legal Disclaimer*************************** > > "This communication may contain confidential and privileged material > > for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, > > use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email > > and delete the message. Thank you." > > ********************************************************* > ******************Legal Disclaimer*************************** > "This communication may contain confidential and privileged > material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any > unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly > prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please > advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank > you." > ********************************************************* >