currently our full index takes around half an hour - its a big dataset ~ serveral million records of detailed product information - this is actually very quick compared to another one of my installations. I would be interested to know which of these methods would reduce indexing time the most.
N ... On 18 August 2011 17:20, Jaeger, Jay - DOT <jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov> wrote: > I would suggest #3, unless you have some very unusual performance > requirements. It has the advantage of isolating your index environment > requirements from the database. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicholas Fellows [mailto:n...@djdownload.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:40 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Solr Copyfields > > Hi I have a question regarding > CopyFields in Solr > > As far as i can tell there are several ways to do the same thing > > 1) create an alias in the SQL Query and Delta Queries > 2) specify multiple fields in the db-data-config.xml having different > "names" for the same column > 3) use the copyField directive in schema.xml > > is there any difference to these approaches? like indexing speed , query > performance, memory consumption etc? > > Kind Regards > > Nick > > -- > Nick Fellows > DJdownload.com > ----------------------------------- > 10 Greenland Street > London > NW10ND > United Kingdom > ----------------------------------- > n...@djdownload.com (E) > > ----------------------------------- > www.djdownload.com > -- Nick Fellows DJdownload.com ----------------------------------- 10 Greenland Street London NW10ND United Kingdom ----------------------------------- n...@djdownload.com (E) ----------------------------------- www.djdownload.com
