I think we should fix replication to copy it? Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Bernd Fehling <bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > > > Am 04.08.2011 12:52, schrieb Michael McCandless: >> >> This file is actually optional; its there for redundancy in case the >> filesystem is not "reliable" when listing a directory. Ie, normally, >> we list the directory to find the latest segments_N file; but if this >> is wrong (eg the file system might have stale a cache) then we >> fallback to reading the segments.gen file. >> >> For example this is sometimes needed for NFS. >> >> Likely replication is just skipping it? > > That was my first idea. If not changed and touched then it will be skipped. > > While being smart I deleted it on slave from index dir and then > replicated, but segment.gen was not replicated. > Due to your explanation NFS could not be reliable any more. > > So my idea either a bug or a feature and the experts will know :-) > > Regards > Bernd > >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Bernd Fehling >> <bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: >>> >>> I have now updated to solr 3.3 but segment.gen is still not replicated. >>> >>> Any idea why, is it a bug or a feature? >>> Should I write a jira issue for it? >>> >>> Regards >>> Bernd >>> >>> Am 29.07.2011 14:10, schrieb Bernd Fehling: >>>> >>>> Dear list, >>>> >>>> is there a deeper logic behind why the segment.gen file is not >>>> replicated with solr 3.2? >>>> >>>> Is it obsolete because I have a single segment? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Bernd >>>> >>> >
