Thanks Robert!!!

"Submitted On 26-JUL-2011" - yesterday.
This option was popular in HbaseŠ


On 11-07-27 3:58 PM, "Robert Muir" <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Don't use this option, these optimizations are buggy:
>
>http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7070134
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Fuad Efendi <f...@efendi.ca> wrote:
>> Anyone tried this? I can not start Solr-Tomcat with following options on
>> Ubuntu:
>>
>> JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Xms2048m -Xmx2048m -Xmn256m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m"
>> JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Dsolr.solr.home=/data/solr -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>> -Duser.timezone=GMT
>> -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/data/solr/logging.properties
>> -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true"
>> JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
>> -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode  -XX:+AggressiveOpts -XX:NewSize=64m
>> -XX:MaxNewSize=64m -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=77
>> -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled"
>> JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -verbose:gc  -XX:+PrintGCDetails
>> -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -Xloggc:/data/solr/solr-gc.log"
>>
>>
>> Tomcat log (something about PorterStemFilter; Solr 3.3.0):
>>
>> INFO: Server startup in 2683 ms
>> #
>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
>> #
>> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007f5c6f36716e, pid=7713, tid=140034519381760
>> #
>> # JRE version: 6.0_26-b03
>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (20.1-b02 mixed mode
>> linux-amd64 compressed oops)
>> # Problematic frame:
>> # J  org.apache.lucene.analysis.PorterStemFilter.incrementToken()Z
>> #
>> [thread 140034523637504 also had an error]
>> [thread 140034520434432 also had an error]
>> # An error report file with more information is saved as:
>> # [thread 140034520434432 also had an error]
>> #
>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>> #   http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
>> #
>>
>>
>>
>> However, I can start it and run without any problems by removing
>> -XX:+AggressiveOpts (which has to be default setting "in upcoming
>>releases"
>> Java 6)
>>
>>
>>
>> Do we need to disable -XX:-DoEscapeAnalysis as IBM suggests?
>> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21422605
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Fuad Efendi
>>
>> http://www.tokenizer.ca
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>lucidimagination.com


Reply via email to