On 06/01/2011 08:22 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Thanks Shashi, this is oddly coincidental with another issue being put > into Solr (SOLR-2193) to help solve some of the NRT issues, the timing > is impeccable. Hmm, does anyone have an idea on when this will be finished?
I'm considering if I should wait for the patch to solidify or if I should switch to ES. > At a base however Solr uses Lucene, as does ES. I think the main > advantage of ES is the auto-sharding etc. I think it uses a gossip > protocol to capitalize on this however... Hmm... Yes it looks nice. T > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Shashi Kant <sk...@sloan.mit.edu> wrote: >> Here is a very interesting comparison >> >> http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/ >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mark >>> Sent: May-31-11 10:33 PM >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> Subject: Solr vs ElasticSearch >>> >>> I've been hearing more and more about ElasticSearch. Can anyone give me a >>> rough overview on how these two technologies differ. What are the >>> strengths/weaknesses of each. Why would one choose one of the other? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- Regards / Med vennlig hilsen Tarjei Huse Mobil: 920 63 413
