how this method (http://localhost:8983/solr/select?shards=*<Machine>:<Port>/<Solr Path>,**<Machine>:<Port>/<Solr Path>*&indent=true&q=<query>) is better than zooKeeper, could you please refer any performance doc.
On 7 June 2011 08:18, bmdakshinamur...@gmail.com <bmdakshinamur...@gmail.com > wrote: > Instead of integrating zookeeper, you could create shards over multiple > machines and specify the shards while you are querying solr. > Eg: http://localhost:8983/solr/select?shards=*<Machine>:<Port>/<Solr > Path>,* > *<Machine>:<Port>/<Solr Path>*&indent=true&q=<query> > > > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mohammad Shariq <shariqn...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Hi folk, > > I am using solr to index around 100mn docs. > > now I am planning to move to cluster based solr, so that I can scale the > > indexing and searching process. > > since solrCloud is in development stage, I am trying to index in shard > > based environment using zooKeeper. > > > > I followed the steps from > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ZooKeeperIntegrationthen also I am not > > able to do distributes search. > > Once I index the docs in one shard, not able to query from other shard > and > > vice-versa, (using the query > > > > > http://localhost:8180/solr/select/?q=itunes&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on > > ) > > > > I am running solr3.1 on ubuntu 10.10. > > > > please help me. > > > > > > -- > > Thanks and Regards > > Mohammad Shariq > > > > > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > DakshinaMurthy BM > -- Thanks and Regards Mohammad Shariq
