Hi Ludovic, That's an option we had before we decided to go for a full-blown support of wildcards.
Do you know of a way to keep both stemming and consistent wildcard support in the same field?` Dmitry On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, lboutros <boutr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think you have to use stemming on both side (index and query) if you > really want to use stemming. > > Ludovic > > 2011/5/3 Dmitry Kan [via Lucene] < > ml-node+2893599-894006307-383...@n3.nabble.com> > > > Dear list, > > > > In SOLR schema on the index side we use no stemming to support favor > > wildcard search. On the query side of the index we use Porter stemming. > > > > I have noticed the following issue: the term "pretty" gets stemmed to > > "pretti" and thus not found. > > > > What would be the approach to handle such situations, is going all the > way > > to modifying the Porter stemming source code the best choice? > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Dmitry Kan > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > > below: > > > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/stemming-for-English-tp2893599p2893599.html > > To start a new topic under Solr - User, email > > ml-node+472068-1765922688-383...@n3.nabble.com > > To unsubscribe from Solr - User, click here< > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=472068&code=Ym91dHJvc2xAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ3MjA2OHw0Mzk2MDUxNjE= > >. > > > > > > > ----- > Jouve > France. > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/stemming-for-English-tp2893599p2893611.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Regards, Dmitry Kan
