Nagendra,
This looks interesting. Does Solr-RA support:
1) facet
2) Boost query such as {!boost b=log(popularity)}foo
Thanks
Andy
--- On Sun, 5/1/11, Nagendra Nagarajayya <nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com> wrote:
> From: Nagendra Nagarajayya <nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com>
> Subject: Re: Has NRT been abandoned?
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Sunday, May 1, 2011, 12:01 PM
> Hi Andy:
>
> I have a solution for NRT with Solr 1.4.1. The solution
> uses the RankingAlgorithm as the search library. The NRT
> functionality allows you to add documents without the
> IndexSearchers being closed or caches being cleared. A
> commit is not needed with the document update. Searches can
> run concurrently with document updates. No changes are
> needed except for enabling the NRT through solrconfig.xml.
> The performance is about 262 TPS (document adds) on a
> dual core intel system with 2GB heap with searches in
> parallel. The performance at the moment is limited by how
> fast IndexWriter.getReader() performs.
>
> I have a white paper that describes NRT in details, allows
> you to download the tweets, schema and solrconfig.xml files.
> You can access the white paper from here:
>
> http://solr-ra.tgels.com/papers/solr-ra_real_time_search.pdf
>
> You can download Solr with RankingAlgorithm (Solr-RA) from
> here:
>
> http://solr-ra.tgels.com
>
> I still have not yet integrated the NRT with Solr 3.1 (the
> new release) and plan to do so very soon.
>
> Please let me know if you need any more info.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Nagendra Nagarajayya
> http://solr-ra.tgels.com
>
> On 5/1/2011 8:28 AM, Andy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read on this mailing list previously that NRT was
> implemented in 4.0, it just wasn't ready for
> production yet. Then I looked at the wiki
> (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearch). It
> listed 2 jira issues related to NRT: SOLR-1308 and
> SOLR-1278. Both issues have their resolutions set to "Won't
> Fix" recently.
> >
> > Does that mean NRT is no longer going to happen?
> What's the state of NRT in Solr?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
>
>
