--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Andrzej Bialecki <a...@getopt.org> wrote:
> :) If you don't need the new functionality in 4.x, you don't > need the performance improvements, What performance improvements does 4.x have over 3.1? > reindexing cycles are long (indexes tend to stay around) > then 3.1 is a safer bet. If you need a dozen or so new > exciting features (e.g. results grouping) or top > performance, or if you need LucidWorks with Click and other > goodies, then use 4.x and be prepared for an occasional full > reindex. So using 4.x would require occasional full reindex but using 3.1 would not? Could you explain? I thought 4.x comes with NRT indexing. So why is full reindex necessary? Thanks. Andy
