Hmmm, let's see 1> your fieldtype definition from the schema.xml for the field in question 2> the results of adding &debugQuery=on to the URL
Otherwise it's kind of hard to know the details of your problem... Also, have you looked at the analysis page for the field in question (from the admin page?) It'll tell you what is actually parsed for the field, it's very helpful Best Erick On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:12 PM, David Yang <dy...@nextjump.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am having some really strange issues matching "N61JQ-B2". If I had a > field "N61JQ-B2", and I wanted to match "N61JQ", "N61JQB2", "N61JQ-B2" > and "N61JQ B2" in dismax, what fieldtype should it have? My final > fallback is to use ngrams but that would impose a pretty large overhead, > since the field could be a long normal string with one model number in > it. > > > > I noticed when I used WordDelimiterFilterFactory the dismax would > convert the parsed query to some pre-analyzed query. > > > > Cheers, > > David > >
