On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Dennis Gearon <gear...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Nearly 100ms? If any netizen ever complained about that, I'd 'round-file' the > complaint. Internal to a single process's execution, well, mabye it's an > issue. > Not too hard to handle. Well there are many caveats, but 100 msec is where (in my testing a while back...) I was able to get down to and not see much impact on ingest rate. But, it's gonna depend heavily on how large the index is, whether you are updating vs just adding, etc. We've made a number of improvements to NRT recently that should make things even faster. For some reason many apps seem to think they need "immediate consistency", but you have to pay a big price for that. > Good job to the team that made it! Thanks! (on behalf of all Lucene contributors/devs) -- Mike http://blog.mikemccandless.com
