Right now I have the slave polling every 10 seconds, becuase we want to make sure they stay in sync. I have users who will do post directly from a web application. But I do notice it syncs very quick, becuase usually the update is only one or two records at a time.
I am thinking maybe 10 seconds is too fast? On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: > The slave should not keep multiple copies _permanently_, but might > temporarily after it's fetched the new files from master, but before it's > committed them and fully wamred the new index searchers in the slave. Could > that be what's going on, is your slave just still working on committing and > warming the new version(s) of the index? > > [If you do 'commit' to slave (and a replication pull counts as a 'commit') > so quick that you get overlapping commits before the slave was able to warm > a new index... its' going to be trouble all around.] > > On 3/1/2011 4:27 PM, Mike Franon wrote: >> >> ok doing some more research I noticed, on the slave it has multiple >> folders where it keeps them for example >> >> index >> index.20110204010900 >> index.20110204013355 >> index.20110218125400 >> >> and then there is an index.properties that shows which index it is using. >> >> I am just curious why does it keep multiple copies? Is there a >> setting somewhere I can change to only keep one copy so not to lose >> space? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mike Franon<kongfra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> No pending commits, what it looks like is there are almost two copies >>> of the index on the master, not sure how that happened. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Markus Jelsma >>> <markus.jel...@openindex.io> wrote: >>>> >>>> Are there pending commits on the master? >>>> >>>>> I was curious why would the size be dramatically different even though >>>>> the index versions are the same? >>>>> >>>>> One is 1.2 Gb, and on the slave it is 512 MB >>>>> >>>>> I would think they should both be the same size no? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >
