Hi , @Tommaso @Jan Høydahl Thanks for the response :) I 've done it almost similar to what Tommaso suggested and yes it's about 70-80% accurate. I understand the contradiction in the search - customer find stuff without the exact right wording (recall) at the same time as you want the query to be precise (precision).
In my scenario both cases are there as well, but mostly a customer would know which product name he is searching for and he will be interested in comparing the prices that different marchants offer. What I feel is that , may be the "Search" itself has to be classified based on the contexts. Will it be possible in solr to have the below: 1 . A customer uses the correct product name to search , get the accurate results 2. A customer uses a keyword or without the exact name , get the most relevant results. 2nd part is fine as it's working good. 1st part is where I'm struggling. thanks Praveen On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Praveen, > as far as I understand you have to set the type of the field(s) you are > searching over to be conservative. > So for example you won't include stemmer and lowercase filters and use only > a whitespace tokenizer, more over you should search with the default > operator set to AND. > Then faceting over those field(s) will depend on those type settings. > You may find the following wiki page useful: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters > My 2 cents, > > > 2011/2/21 Praveen Parameswaran <buz.p...@gmail.com> > > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to have 100% accuracy for facet counts using solr ? Since > > this is for a product price comparison site I would need the search to > > return accurate results. for example if I search "sony lcd Tv" I do not > > want > > "sony Led Tv" to be returned int he results. Please let me know if this > is > > possible and how? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Prav > > >
