sorry for cross posting, but that is the only I could get my question
posted. SOLR Mailing server treats my question as SPAM


Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further
information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server
returned was: 552 552 spam score (5.1) exceeded threshold
(FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL (state 18).


On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:

> When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
> an existing message, instead start a fresh email.  Even if you change the
> subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread
> you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less
> attention.   It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives
> particularly difficult.
>
> See: http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:59 PM, charan kumar <charan.ku...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >  Quick question on solr replication?
> >
> >  What effect does  index reload after a replication has on search
> requests?
> > Can server still respond to user queries with old index?
> >
> >  Especially, during the following phases of replication on slaves.
> >
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#How_does_the_slave_replicate.3F
> >
> >
> > *>  After the download completes, all the new files are 'mov'ed to the
> > slave's live index directory and the files' timestamps will match the
> > timestamps in the master.
> > > A 'commit' command is issued on the slave by the Slave's
> > ReplicationHandler and the new index is loaded
> >
> >
> > *
> > Thanks,
> > Charan
> >
>

Reply via email to