Hi peter , Can you elaborate a little on how performance gain is in cache warming.I am getting a good improvement on search time.
On 6 February 2011 23:29, Peter Sturge <peter.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We use this scenario in production where we have one write-only Solr > instance and 1 read-only, pointing to the same data. > We do this so we can optimize caching/etc. for each instance for > write/read. The main performance gain is in cache warming and > associated parameters. > For your Index W, it's worth turning off cache warming altogether, so > commits aren't slowed down by warming. > > Peter > > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Isan Fulia <isan.fu...@germinait.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have setup two indexes one for reading(R) and other for > writing(W).Index R > > refers to the same data dir of W (defined in solrconfig via <dataDir>). > > To make sure the R index sees the indexed documents of W , i am firing an > > empty commit on R. > > With this , I am getting performance improvement as compared to using the > > same index for reading and writing . > > Can anyone help me in knowing why this performance improvement is taking > > place even though both the indexeses are pointing to the same data > > directory. > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Isan Fulia. > > > -- Thanks & Regards, Isan Fulia.
