Has anyone noticed the rails application that installs with Solr4.0? I am 
interested to hear some feedback on that one...

Adam


On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> wrote:

> Tomas,
> 
> I also know velocity can be used and works well.
> I would be interested to a simpler way to have the objects of SOLR available 
> in a jsp than write a custom jsp processor as a request handler; indeed, this 
> seems to be the way solrj is expected to be used in the wiki page.
> 
> Actually I migrated to velocity (which I like less than jsp) just because I 
> did not find a response to this question.
> 
> paul
> 
> 
> Le 31 janv. 2011 à 21:53, Tomás Fernández Löbbe a écrit :
> 
>> Hi John, you can use whatever you want for building your application, using
>> Solr on the backend (JSP included). You should find all the information you
>> need on Solr's wiki page:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
>> 
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/>including some client libraries to easy
>> integrate your application with Solr:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr
>> 
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr>for fast prototyping you could
>> use Velocity:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/VelocityResponseWriter
>> 
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/VelocityResponseWriter>Anyway, I recommend you
>> to start with Solr's tutorial:
>> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
>> 
>> 
>> Good luck,
>> <http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html>Tomás
>> 
>> 2011/1/31 JOHN JAIRO GÓMEZ LAVERDE <jjai...@hotmail.com>
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> SOLR LUCENE
>>> DEVELOPERS
>>> 
>>> Hi i am new to solr and i like to make a custom search page for enterprise
>>> users
>>> in JSP that takes the results of Apache Solr.
>>> 
>>> - Where i can find some useful examples for that topic ?
>>> - Is JSP the correct approach to solve mi requirement ?
>>> - If not what is the best solution to build a customize search page for my
>>> users?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> from South America
>>> 
>>> JOHN JAIRO GOMEZ LAVERDE
>>> Bogotá - Colombia
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to