In general, patches are applied to the source tree and it's re-compiled.
See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Working_With_Patches
This is pretty easy, and I do know that "some people" have applied the
eDismax
patch to the 1.4 code line, but I haven't done it myself.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu>wrote:
> Yes, I think nested queries are the only way to do that, and yes, nested
> queries like Daniel's example work (I've done it myself). I haven't really
> tried to get into understanding/demonstrating _exactly_ how the relevance
> ends up working on the overall master query in such a situation, but it sort
> of works.
>
> (Just note that Daniel's example isn't quite right, I think you need double
> quotes for the nested _query_, just check the wiki page/blog post on nested
> queries).
>
> Does eDismax handle parens for order of operation too? If so, eDismax is
> probably the best/easiest solution, especially if you're trying to parse an
> incoming query from some OTHER format and translate it to something that can
> be sent to Solr, which is what I often do.
>
> I haven't messed with eDismax myself yet. Does anyone know if there's any
> easy (easy!) way to get eDismax in a Solr 1.4? Any easy way to compile an
> eDismax query parser on it's own that works with Solr 1.4, and then just
> drop it into your local lib/ for use with an existing Solr 1.4?
>
> Jonathan
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Daniel Pötzinger [daniel.poetzin...@aoemedia.de]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:26 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: AW: DismaxParser Query
>
> It may also be an option to mix the query parsers?
> Something like this (not tested):
>
> q={!lucene}field1:test OR field2:test2 _query_:{!dismax qf=fields}+my
> dismax -bad
>
> So you have the benefits of lucene and dismax parser
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2011 15:15
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: DismaxParser Query
>
> What version of Solr are you using, and could you consider either 3x or
> applying a patch to 1.4.1? Because eDismax (extended dismax) handles the
> full Lucene query language and probably works here. See the Solr
> JIRA 1553 at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Isan Fulia <isan.fu...@germinait.com
> >wrote:
>
> > It worked by making mm=0 (it acted as OR operator)
> > but how to handle this
> >
> > field1:((keyword1 AND keyword2) OR (keyword3 AND keyword4)) OR
> > field2:((keyword1 AND keyword2) OR (keyword3 AND keyword4)) OR
> > field3:((keyword1 AND keyword2) OR (keyword3 AND keyword4))
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27 January 2011 17:06, lee carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > sorry ignore that - we are on dismax here - look at mm param in the
> docs
> > > you can set this to achieve what you need
> > >
> > > On 27 January 2011 11:34, lee carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > the default operation can be set in your config to be "or" or on the
> > > query
> > > > something like q.op=OR
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 27 January 2011 11:26, Isan Fulia <isan.fu...@germinait.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> but q="keyword1 keyword2" does AND operation not OR
> > > >>
> > > >> On 27 January 2011 16:22, lee carroll <lee.a.carr...@googlemail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > use dismax q for first three fields and a filter query for the 4th
> > and
> > > >> 5th
> > > >> > fields
> > > >> > so
> > > >> > q="keyword1 keyword 2"
> > > >> > qf = field1,feild2,field3
> > > >> > pf = field1,feild2,field3
> > > >> > mm=something sensible for you
> > > >> > defType=dismax
> > > >> > fq=" field4:(keyword3 OR keyword4) AND field5:(keyword5)"
> > > >> >
> > > >> > take a look at the dismax docs for extra params
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 27 January 2011 08:52, Isan Fulia <isan.fu...@germinait.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi all,
> > > >> > > The query for standard request handler is as follows
> > > >> > > field1:(keyword1 OR keyword2) OR field2:(keyword1 OR keyword2)
> OR
> > > >> > > field3:(keyword1 OR keyword2) AND field4:(keyword3 OR keyword4)
> > AND
> > > >> > > field5:(keyword5)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > How the same above query can be written for dismax request
> handler
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > >> > > Isan Fulia.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Thanks & Regards,
> > > >> Isan Fulia.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Isan Fulia.
> >
>
