Ahhh, ignore my blather, I need more coffee. Somehow I was thinking about something else.
Best Erick On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > Let's back up a bit here. What is the field definition for the field you're > doing the range query on? i.e. [1 TO *]? And what are you trying > to accomplish with that clause (that is, all non-zero documents? > all documents? Do you have counts < 1?). > > What version of Solr are you using? > > You'll also gain insights by stripping away all the other stuff and > concentrating > on one thing at a time. I suspect that you're using one of the field > types that isn't very good with range queries and that query-time > expansion is blowing the max boolean clauses limit. Try your > query with &debugQuery=on and a smaller range, say [1 TO 10]. > I suspect you'll see 10 OR clauses. > > But I've been very wrong before <G>... > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Qi Ouyang <alphaouy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Now I think that hl.requireFieldMatch=false is a problem, because >> there is no meaning to match query string of "kcmeta/view/count" to >> the high-light field "title" and "body". To support for full-text >> query field search matching high-light fields, I think it's better to >> add same query condition on "title" and "body". >> Ex. original query content:"book" >> convert to query : content:"book" OR title:"book" OR body:"book" >> By using this query, I think it is possible to highlight "title" and >> "body" by the query on "content". >> >> Thank for your suggestion. >> >> Ouyang >> >> https://sites.google.com/a/spectrum.co.jp/openinsight/ >> > >
