Why do you want to do this? It'd be the same value, just stored in
multiple fields in the document, which seems a waste. What's
the use-case you're addressing?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Dear list,
> another suggestion about SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory.
>
> Why can I make signatures of several fields and place the
> result in one field but _not_ make a signature of one field
> and place the result in several fields.
>
> Could be realized without huge programming?
>
> Best regards,
> Bernd
>
>
> Am 29.11.2010 14:30, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > a question about Solr SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory:
> >
> > for (String field : sigFields) {
> > SolrInputField f = doc.getField(field);
> > if (f != null) {
> > * sig.add(field);
> > Object o = f.getValue();
> > if (o instanceof String) {
> > sig.add((String)o);
> > } else if (o instanceof Collection) {
> > for (Object oo : (Collection)o) {
> > if (oo instanceof String) {
> > sig.add((String)oo);
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Why is also the field name (* above) added to the signature
> > and not only the content of the field?
> >
> > By purpose or by accident?
> >
> > I would like to suggest removing the field name from the signature and
> > not mixing it up.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bernd
>
