Why do you want to? Basically, the caches are there to improve #searching#. To search something, you must index it. Retrieving it is usually a rare enough operation that caching is irrelevant.
This smells like an XY problem, see: http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem If this seems like gibberish, could you explain your problem a little more? Best Erick On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Mathias Walter <mathias.wal...@gmx.net>wrote: > Hi, > > does a field which should be cached needs to be indexed? > > I have a binary field which is just stored. Retrieving it via > FieldCache.DEFAULT.getTerms returns empty ByteRefs. > > Then I found the following post: > http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@lucene.apache.org/msg05403.html > > How can I use the FieldCache with a binary field? > > -- > Kind regards, > Mathias > >
