That looks very promising based on a couple of quick queries. Any objections if I move the javadoc help into the wiki, specifically:
Create a term query from the input value without any text analysis or > transformation whatsoever. This is useful in debugging, or when raw terms > are returned from the terms component (this is not the default). Thanks Eric! sasank On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > This may be a wild herring, but have you tried "raw"? NOTE: I'm a little > out of my depth here on what this actually does, so don't waste time by > thinking I'm an authority on this one. See: > > http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/search/RawQParserPlugin.html > > and > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax > (this last under "built in query parsers"). > > HTH > Erick > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Sasank Mudunuri <sas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Solr Users, > > > > I used the TermsComponent to walk through all the indexed terms and find > > ones of particular interest (named entities). And now, I'd like to search > > for documents that contain these particular entities. I have both > > query-time > > and index-time stemming set for the field, which means I can't just hit > the > > normal search handler because as I understand, it will stem the > > already-stemmed term. Any ideas about how to search directly for the > > indexed > > term? Maybe something I can do at query-time to disable stemming? > > > > Thanks! > > sasank > > >
