Hi, Thank you all for your quick response. Just to clarify I take it for my particular problem (taking advantage of the spatial search functionality) my best option is 3.1 and that should be reasonably stable?
As pointed out before it would be useful to have some kind of documented road map for development, and some kind of indication of how close certain versions are to release. Cheers, Mike. On 14 Oct 2010, at 19:47, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: >> Thanks Yonik! So I gather that the 1.5 branch has essentially been >> abandoned, we can pretend it doesn't exist at all, it's been entirely >> superceded by the 3.x branch, with the changes made just for the purposes of >> syncronizing versions with lucene. > > Right. Everything marked as 1.5 in the past is in 3.1-dev and 4.0-dev. > > 1.5 was always just a place-holder for the "next" release, which could > have been 2.0 if we had upgraded Lucene and changed enough stuff in > Solr. So even before the Lucene/Solr merge, a 1.5 release was never > really guaranteed. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com
