I think that's good thinking. I wonder, do the two phases have to be invoked externally by two queries, or why couldn't it be all self contained in each instance behind the load leveler?
Just curious how it works. Dennis Gearon Signature Warning ---------------- It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' EARTH has a Right To Life, otherwise we all die. --- On Wed, 10/13/10, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > From: Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> > Subject: Re: LuceneRevolution - NoSQL: A comparison > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, October 13, 2010, 5:46 AM > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jan > Høydahl / Cominvent > <jan....@cominvent.com> > wrote: > > I'm pretty sure the 2nd phase to fetch doc-summaries > goes directly to same server as first phase. But what if you > stick a LB in between? > > A related point - the load balancing implementation that's > part of > SolrCloud (and looks like it will be committed to trunk > soon), does > keep track of what server it used for the first phase and > uses that > for subsequent phases. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com >
