The javascript will be slower. There is no bytecode compilation. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Tim Heckman <theck...@gmail.com> wrote: > This might be a dumb question, but should I expect that a custom > transformer written in java will perform better than a javascript > script transformer? > > Or does the javascript get compiled to bytecode such that there really > should not be much difference between the two? > > Of course, the bigger performance issue I'm dealing with is getting > the data out of the SQL database as quickly as possible, but I'm > curious about the performance implications of a script transform vs. > the same transform done in java. > > > thanks, > Tim >
-- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com