I guess I missed the init() method.  I was looking at the factory and
thought I saw config loading stuff (like getInt) which I assumed meant it
need to have schema.xml available.

Thanks!

-Max

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Mathias Walter <mathias.wal...@gmx.net>wrote:

> Hi Max,
>
> why don't you use WordDelimiterFilterFactory directly? I'm doing the same
> stuff inside my own analyzer:
>
> final Map<String, String> args = new HashMap<String, String>();
>
> args.put("generateWordParts", "1");
> args.put("generateNumberParts", "1");
> args.put("catenateWords", "0");
> args.put("catenateNumbers", "0");
> args.put("catenateAll", "0");
> args.put("splitOnCaseChange", "1");
> args.put("splitOnNumerics", "1");
> args.put("preserveOriginal", "1");
> args.put("stemEnglishPossessive", "0");
> args.put("language", "English");
>
> wordDelimiter = new WordDelimiterFilterFactory();
> wordDelimiter.init(args);
> stream = wordDelimiter.create(stream);
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Mathias
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Max Lynch [mailto:ihas...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:03 AM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Using Solr Analyzers in Lucene
> >
> > I have made progress on this by writing my own Analyzer.  I basically
> added
> > the TokenFilters that are under each of the solr factory classes.  I had
> to
> > copy and paste the WordDelimiterFilter because, of course, it was package
> > protected.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Max Lynch <ihas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I asked this question a month ago on lucene-user and was referred here.
> > >
> > > I have content being analyzed in Solr using these tokenizers and
> filters:
> > >
> > > <fieldType name="text_standard" class="solr.TextField"
> > > positionIncrementGap="100">
> > >    <analyzer type="index">
> > >          <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >
> > >         <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory"
> > > generateWordParts="0" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1"
> > > catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
> > >         <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >         <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory"
> language="English"
> > > protected="protwords.txt"/>
> > >       </analyzer>
> > >       <analyzer type="query">
> > >         <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >         <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory"
> > > generateWordParts="0" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1"
> > > catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
> > >         <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >         <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory"
> language="English"
> > > protected="protwords.txt"/>
> > >       </analyzer>
> > > </fieldType>
> > >
> > > Basically I want to be able to search against this index in Lucene with
> one
> > > of my background searching applications.
> > >
> > > My main reason for using Lucene over Solr for this is that I use the
> > > highlighter to keep track of exactly which terms were found which I use
> for
> > > my own scoring system and I always collect the whole set of found
> > > documents.  I've messed around with using Boosts but it wasn't fine
> grained
> > > enough and I wasn't able to effectively create a score threshold (would
> > > creating my own scorer be a better idea?)
> > >
> > > Is it possible to use this analyzer from Lucene, or at least re-create
> it
> > > in code?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to