We'll be able to 'kick the tires' in about 3 weeks, sorry for that delay. But at that time, we'll be able to start using geo spatial in combination with all the other solr stuff.
Not having the pseudo field is a REAL BUMMER, though, since I want to display distance from the results. Is there a work around for that? Dennis Gearon Signature Warning ---------------- EARTH has a Right To Life, otherwise we all die. Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded' Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php --- On Fri, 9/24/10, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > From: Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> > Subject: Re: LocalSolr unknown handler: geo > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Friday, September 24, 2010, 1:05 PM > I'd say it's about 85-90% there, but > of course, you don't know what you don't know. Biggest > thing missing now is "pseudo-fields", IMO, i.e. the ability > to return the distance as a field. Next after that is > some type of tile/grid approach, but that's less important > given we have Trie fields for numerics. Also needs > better documentation. I know Yonik is also doing some > refactoring for performance. > > I think we've worked out most of the kinks around accuracy, > etc. and have a reasonable bounding box calculation as well > as implementations of several distance functions. I'd > encourage you to kick the tires at least and let us know > what you think. Most importantly, I think the changes we > have made to implement spatial have also improved Solr. > > On Sep 24, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Dennis Gearon wrote: > > > How functional is spatial in 3.x? > > Dennis Gearon > > > > Signature Warning > > ---------------- > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > otherwise we all die. > > > > Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded' > > Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php > > > > > > --- On Fri, 9/24/10, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> From: Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> > >> Subject: Re: LocalSolr unknown handler: geo > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >> Date: Friday, September 24, 2010, 5:22 AM > >> You're best off to ask on the Local > >> Solr mailing list, or have a look at Solr's 3.x > and trunk > >> branches, which have spatial baked in (although it > is still > >> improving) > >> > >> On Sep 24, 2010, at 5:57 AM, PeterKerk wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I've configured LocalSolr according to > description on > >> this page: > >>> http://www.gissearch.com/localsolr > >>> > >>> I use Solr 1.4.1. > >>> > >>> I've compiled the LocalSolr jars and put them > in the > >> Solr lib: > >>> \apache-solr-1.4.1\example\solr\lib > >>> > >>> The lib folder didnt exist so I created it and > put the > >> LocalSolr jars in > >>> there. > >>> > >>> But when I execute the query: > >>> http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?indent=on&facet=true&fl=id,lat,lng,title&q=*:*&qt=geo&lat=51.8316819&long=5.815154&radius=500 > >>> > >>> I get the error: > >>> HTTP ERROR: 400 > >>> > >>> unknown handler: geo > >>> > >>> RequestURI=/solr/db/select/ > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: > >>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/LocalSolr-unknown-handler-geo-tp1572964p1572964.html > >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive > at > >> Nabble.com. > >> > >> -------------------------- > >> Grant Ingersoll > >> http://lucenerevolution.org Apache > Lucene/Solr > >> Conference, Boston Oct 7-8 > >> > >> > > -------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll > http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr > Conference, Boston Oct 7-8 > >
