Sorry to bother you, but since I haven't had a reply in a week, I figured I'd try asking again...
What build of Solr are you using personally? Are you just using a nightly build, or is there a specific build that you are using? Has it had any major screw-ups for you? And I still would love to see your code. Regards, Thomas On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Thomas Joiner <thomas.b.joi...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'd love to see your code on this, however what I've really been wondering > is the following: When did AbstractSubTypeFieldType get added? It isn't in > 1.4.1 (as far as I can tell that's the latest one that is bundled on their > site). So, do I just need to grab it from subversion, and build it? And if > so, is there a particular revision that I should go with? Or should I just > pull trunk and use that, and last of all, is trunk stable enough to be used > in production? > > Regards, > Thomas > > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Mark Allan <mark.al...@ed.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On 9 Aug 2010, at 1:01 pm, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: >> >> Mark, >>> >>> A good way to get your changes/improvements into Solr is by putting them >>> in >>> JIRA. Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Otis >>> >> >> >> Hi Otis, >> >> For the class which requires only minor modifications, I tested it to >> ensure it doesn't break existing compatibility/functionality, and then I >> created an issue in JIRA and uploaded a patch: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1986 >> >> I then posted a message about it to the list and got the following >> responses. >> >> On 7 Jul 2010, at 6:24 pm, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Originally, I had intended that it was just for one Field Sub Type, >>>> thinking that if we ever wanted multiple sub types, that a new, separate >>>> class would be needed >>>> >>> >>> Right - this was my original thinking too. AbstractSubTypeFieldType is >>> only a convenience class to create compound types... people can do it other >>> ways. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com >>> >> >> >> When I replied to ask if that meant the changes wouldn't be included, I >> got no response. As there's been no activity in JIRA, I didn't bother >> putting any of my other changes into JIRA as they all relied on that one. >> Mark >> >> >> -- >> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in >> Scotland, with registration number SC005336. >> >> >
