Dennis, Unfortunately it's not ready, at least not SOLR-236. There is another issue that you could look at.... from memory, I think it's SOLR-1682.
Otis ---- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ ----- Original Message ---- > From: Dennis Gearon <gear...@sbcglobal.net> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Fri, August 6, 2010 10:44:35 AM > Subject: Re: No "group by"? looking for an alternative. > > I thought that field collapsing as already 'ready for prime time', just not > yet >integrated into the core? > > > Dennis Gearon > > Signature Warning > ---------------- > EARTH has a Right To Life, > otherwise we all die. > > Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded' > Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php > > > --- On Thu, 8/5/10, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: No "group by"? looking for an alternative. > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Date: Thursday, August 5, 2010, 8:17 PM > > I can see how one document per model > > blows up when you have many > > options. But how many models of the shoe do they actually > > make? They > > can't possibly make 5000, one for every metadat > > combination. > > > > If you go with one document per model, you have to do a > > second search > > on that product ID to get all of the models. > > > > Field Collapsing is exactly for the 'many shoes for one > > product' > > problem, but it is not released, so the second search is > > what you > > want. > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> > > wrote: > > > Mickael Magniez wrote: > > >> > > >> Thanks for your response. > > >> > > >> Unfortunately, I don't think it'll be enough. In > > fact, I have many other > > >> products than shoes in my index, with many other > > facets fields. > > >> > > >> I simplified my schema : in reality facets are > > dynamic fields. > > >> > > > > > > You could change the way you do indexing, so every > > product-color-size combo > > > is it's own "document". > > > > > > Document1: > > > product: running shoe > > > size: 12 > > > color: red > > > > > > Document2: > > > product: running shoe > > > size: 13 > > > color: red > > > > > > That would let you do the kind of facetting drill-down > > you want to do. It > > > would of course make other things more complicated. > > But it's the only way I > > > can think of to let you do the kind of facet > > drill-down you want, if I > > > understand what you want correctly, which I may not. > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Lance Norskog > > goks...@gmail.com > > >
