I'm having trouble getting my head around what you're trying to accomplish, so if this is off base you know why <G>.
But what it smells like is that you're trying to do database-ish things in a SOLR index, which is almost always the wrong approach. Is there a way to index redundant data with each document so all you have to do to get the "relevant" users is a simple query? Adding scores is also suspect.. I don't see how that does predictable things. But I'm also failing completely to understand what a "relevant" user is. not much help, if this is way off base perhaps you could provide some additional use-cases? Best Erick On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Bharat Jain <bharat.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > I have a index which store multiple objects belonging to a user > > for e.g. > <schema> > <field name="objType" type="..." /> ---------> Identifies user > object type e.g. userBasic or userAdv > > <!-- obj 1 --> > <field name="first_name" type="..." /> ----> MAPS to userBasicInfoObject > <field name="last_name" type="..." /> > > <!-- obj 2 --> > <field name="user_data_1" type="..." /> -----> MAPS to userAdvInfoObject > <field name="user_data_2" type="..." /> > > </schema> > > > Now when I am doing some query I get multiple records mapping to java > objects (identified by objType) that belong to the same user. > > > Now I want to show the relevant users at the top of the list. I am thinking > of adding the Lucene scores of different result documents to get the best > scores. Is this correct approach to get the relevance of the user? > > Thanks > Bharat Jain >
