I uses format like yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ssZ. it works

2010/7/26 Rafal Bluszcz Zawadzki <ra...@headnet.dk>:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Data Import Handler from Solr 1.4.
>
> Parts of my data-config.xml are:
>
>
>        <entity name="page"
>                processor="XPathEntityProcessor"
>                stream="false"
>                forEach="/multistatus/response"
>                url="/tmp/file.xml"
>
>  transformer="RegexTransformer,DateFormatTransformer,TemplateTransformer"
>                >
> .....
>
>            <field column="modified"
>  xpath="/multistatus/response/propstat/prop/getlastmodified"
> dateTimeFormat="EEE, d MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss z" />
>            <field column="CreationDate"
>  xpath="/multistatus/response/propstat/prop/creationdate"
> dateTimeFormat="yyyy-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss'Z'"/>
>
> During full-import I got message:
>
> WARNING: Error creating document :
> SolrInputDocument[{SearchableText=SearchableText(1.0)={phrase},
> parentPaths=parentPaths(1.0)={/site},
> review_state=review_state(1.0)={published}, created=created(1.0)={Sat Oct 11
> 14:38:27 CEST 2003}, UID=UID(1.0)={http://www.example.com:80/File-1563},
> Title=Title(1.0)={This is only an example document},
> portal_type=portal_type(1.0)={Document}, modified=modified(1.0)={Wed, 15 Jul
> 2009 08:23:34 GMT}}]
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid Date String:'Wed, 15 Jul 2009
> 08:23:34 GMT'
> at org.apache.solr.schema.DateField.parseMath(DateField.java:163)
> at org.apache.solr.schema.TrieDateField.createField(TrieDateField.java:171)
> at org.apache.solr.schema.SchemaField.createField(SchemaField.java:94)
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.DocumentBuilder.toDocument(DocumentBuilder.java:246)
> at
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:60)
>
> Which as I understand, means that Solr / Java coudnt parse my date.
>
> In my xml file it looks like:
> <getlastmodified>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:23:34 GMT</getlastmodified>
>
> In my opinion format "EEE, d MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss z" is correct, and what more
> important - it was suppouse to work with same data week ago :)
>
> Any idea will be appreciate.
>
> --
> Rafal Zawadzki
> Backend developer
>

Reply via email to