I'm in the process of indexing my demi data to test that, I'll have more valid data on whether or not it made the differeve In a few days Thanks
ב-23/07/2010, בשעה 19:42, "Jonathan Rochkind [via Lucene]" < ml-node+990234-2085494904-316...@n3.nabble.com> כתב/ה: > and a typical query would be: > fl=id,type,timestamp,score&start=0&q="Coca+Cola"+pepsi+-"dr+pepper"&fq=timestamp:[2010-07-07T00:00:00Z+TO+NOW]+AND+(type:x+OR+type:y)& > rows=2000 My understanding is that this is essentially what the solr 1.4 trie date fields are made for, I'd use them, should speed things up. Not sure where the best documentation for them is, but see: http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/05/13/exploring-lucene-and-solrs-trierange-capabilities/ ------------------------------ View message @ http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/filter-query-on-timestamp-slowing-query-tp977280p990234.html To unsubscribe from Re: filter query on timestamp slowing query???, click here< (link removed) =>. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/filter-query-on-timestamp-slowing-query-tp977280p990337.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
