Well, 1147 is still open and none of the comments indicate it's been
applied, so
no. And there's no subversion commits...

Is 1.4 nightly stable? I can't answer that. It's stable enough to pass all
the unit tests,
but that's not a strong endorsement...

Patches are applied to the source code, then the source code is all
compiled. These
are NOT binary patches you can apply to a jar. So, unless you're willing to
check out
the source code, apply the patch to the source (and, btw, there's no
guarantee that the
patch will apply cleanly to any given version of the source tree), compile
all of SOLR
and distribute the resulting WAR, you won't be able to apply the patch.

See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute for the basic instructions.
At a minimum
you'll need ant, Java (can you compile and run the "hello world" java
intro?), and subversion.

Here's a place to get started with basic compilation:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17409_01/javase/tutorial/getStarted/cupojava/index.html

But note that you need to get a specific version of the source (I'm sure
it's tagged appropriately
for the latest 1.4 release, but I don't know what the tag is). Something
like
svn co -r <tag>.

It's not as hard as I may be making it seem, but it's up to you to determine
whether the
bother is worth the risk of just taking the latest successful 1.4 build.

HTH
Erick

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Chamnap Chhorn <chamnapchh...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Is there an easy way to apply this patch to solr 1.4 release in my system
> because I will use in the production server.
>
> Thanks,
> Chamnap
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Chamnap Chhorn <chamnapchh...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > The other thing I want to ask is the latest build of solr is stable or
> not?
> > I'm afraid it might bring some other problems to my system.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chamnap
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Chamnap Chhorn <chamnapchh...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, I get what you mean. One more thing, I wonder the patch SOLR-1147
> has
> >> included in the last successful build or not?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Chamnap
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Erick Erickson <
> erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not 1.4 released, 1.4 last successful build. I don't think the 1.4
> >>> release
> >>> has the patch applied.
> >>>
> >>> See the second link I originally provided.
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>> Erick
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Chamnap Chhorn <
> chamnapchh...@gmail.com
> >>> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I'm using Solr 1.4, but the exclusive=true doesn't work for me at
> all.
> >>> I
> >>> > wonder how that is ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Any ideas?
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Erick Erickson <
> >>> erickerick...@gmail.com
> >>> > >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > I don't think you need to go there. That patch has been committed
> >>> > > to the 3.x code line as well as the 1.4. You can get the 3x build
> >>> here:
> >>> > > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/
> >>> > > Just try that...
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Or you can get the latest build if you're working with 1.4 here:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/solr/dist/
> >>> > >
> >>> > > HTH
> >>> > > Erick
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Chamnap Chhorn <
> >>> chamnapchh...@gmail.com
> >>> > > >wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > I'm a ruby developer, no background in Java at all. I need
> >>> > > > *exclusive=true*to work on elevation search component. However,
> it
> >>> > > > does need a patch,
> >>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1966. Anyone could
> >>> present
> >>> > me
> >>> > > a
> >>> > > > step by step in order to do that?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > --
> >>> > > > Chhorn Chamnap
> >>> > > > http://chamnapchhorn.blogspot.com/
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Chhorn Chamnap
> >>> > http://chamnapchhorn.blogspot.com/
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chhorn Chamnap
> > http://chamnapchhorn.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chhorn Chamnap
> http://chamnapchhorn.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to