On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > Originally, I had intended that it was just for one Field Sub Type, thinking > that if we ever wanted multiple sub types, that a new, separate class would > be needed
Right - this was my original thinking too. AbstractSubTypeFieldType is only a convenience class to create compound types... people can do it other ways. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
