Thats a good note. I get this kind of question a lot.
Most of the time, the reason is because there are database servers (MySQL) and Webservers (Apache) and other processes running on the Linux box. Try to verify that the load, number of processors/cores as well as other environment settings are similar before drawing a conclusion. On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > BB, > > Could it be that you are comparing apples and oranges? > * Is the hardware identical? > * Are indices identical? > * Are JVM versions the same? > * Are JVM arguments identical? > * Are the two boxes "equally idle" when Solr is not running? > > * etc. > > In general, no, there is no reason why Windows would automatically be > faster than Linux. > > Otis > ---- > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: bbarani <bbar...@gmail.com> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Wed, June 16, 2010 5:06:55 PM > > Subject: SOLR search performance - Linux vs Windows servers > > > > > Hi, > > I have SOLR instances running in both Linux / windows server > > (same version / > same index data). Search performance is good in windows > > box compared to > Linux box. > > Some queries takes more than 10 seconds in > > Linux box but takes just a second > in windows box. Have anyone encountered > > this kind of issue before? > > Thanks, > BB > -- > View this message in > > context: > > href=" > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-search-performance-Linux-vs-Windows-servers-tp901069p901069.html > " > > target=_blank > > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-search-performance-Linux-vs-Windows-servers-tp901069p901069.html > Sent > > from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- "Good Enough" is not good enough. To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. Quality First. Measure Twice. Cut Once. http://www.israelekpo.com/
