Hi Lance, > You cannot give it a wildcard to go find dynamic fields;
ah, ok. But it would be nice to use wildcards. You correctly guessed that I meant the wildcard querying. The dynamicField definition is not the problem ... So one can define <dynamicField name="*_t" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true"/> and then the query via myfield_t would work. The termVectors is only for performance reasons, I think (it worked without this attribute). Now, regarding "stored" or "not-stored": mlt worked for me if I did: <field name="myfield" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true"/> But not if I do <field name="myfield" type="text" indexed="true" stored="false"/> Or do I need to configure the field in a different way? Regards, Peter. > MoreLikeThis works on any field you can name. You cannot give it a > wildcard to go find dynamic fields; no query feature can do this > (would be handy!). > > The field must have term vectors configured. In the > solr/example/solr/conf schema, the 'includes' field has this set and > you can do MLT on that. Try 'usb' as a search term for the electronics > store example in solr/example/solr. > > I don't know if the needs to be stored. Also, whether it can work on > terms in a multi-valued field. You'll have to reconfigure the 'text' > copyField target to have term vectors. > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Peter Karich <peat...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> it seems to me that the MoreLikeThis component doesn't work for dynamic >> fields. Is that correct? >> And it also doesn't work for fields which are indexed but not stored, >> right? e.g. 'text' where dynamic fields could be copied to. >> >> Or did I create an incorrect example? >> >> Regards, >> Peter. >> >> -- >> http://karussell.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> > > > -- http://karussell.wordpress.com/
