So let me understand what you said. You went through the trouble to implement a geospatial solution using Solr 1.5, it worked really well. You saw no signs of instability, but decided not to use it anyway?
Did you put it through a routine of tests and witness some stability problem? Or just guessing it had them? I'm just curious the reasoning behind your comment. On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 09:05 +0100, Rob Ganly wrote: > i used the 1.5 build a few weeks ago, implemented the geospatial > functionality and it worked really well. > > however due to the unknown quantity in terms of stability (and the uncertain > future of 1.5) etc. we decided not to use it in production. > > rob ganly > > On 8 June 2010 03:50, Darren Govoni <dar...@ontrenet.com> wrote: > > > I've been experimenting with it, but haven't quite gotten it to work as > > yet. > > > > On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 17:47 -0700, Jay Hill wrote: > > > > > I was wondering about the production readiness of the new-in-trunk > > spatial > > > functionality. Is anyone using this in a production environment? > > > > > > -Jay > > > > > >
