... I meant; the terms component is faster than using facets. Both of cause provide the autocomplete.
________________________________ From: Villemos, Gert [mailto:gert.ville...@logica.com] Sent: Tue 5/4/2010 8:30 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Facets vs TermV's I found a thread ones (sorry; cant remember where) which stated that the issue is performance; the terms component is faster than the autocomplete. I'm no expert but I guess its a question of when the auto complete index gets build. Where as the terms component likely builds it at storage time, the facet component builds it at retrieval time. Me thinks... G. ________________________________ From: Darren Govoni [mailto:dar...@ontrenet.com] Sent: Tue 5/4/2010 3:53 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Facets vs TermV's Hi, I spent a lot of time on the Wiki and am working with facets and tv's, but I'm still confused about something. Basically, what is the difference between issuing a facet field query that returns facets with counts, and a query with term vectors that also returns document frequency counts for terms in a field? They seem almost similar, but I'm missing something I think. i.e. when is best to use one over the other? I know this is Solr 101, but just want to understand it fully. Thanks for any quick tips again. thanks. Please help Logica to respect the environment by not printing this email / Pour contribuer comme Logica au respect de l'environnement, merci de ne pas imprimer ce mail / Bitte drucken Sie diese Nachricht nicht aus und helfen Sie so Logica dabei, die Umwelt zu schützen. / Por favor ajude a Logica a respeitar o ambiente nao imprimindo este correio electronico. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. Please help Logica to respect the environment by not printing this email / Pour contribuer comme Logica au respect de l'environnement, merci de ne pas imprimer ce mail / Bitte drucken Sie diese Nachricht nicht aus und helfen Sie so Logica dabei, die Umwelt zu schützen. / Por favor ajude a Logica a respeitar o ambiente nao imprimindo este correio electronico. This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
