Well right now we're using a nightly build of Solr 1.4 with Lucene 2.9.1. But I would probably just upgrade to a trunk build of Lucene/Solr just to get this working....
Will do! This bug is pretty disappointing. -----Original Message----- From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:42 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FSDirectory Synchronization Issues I don't think that'll work anymore (it used to with old versions of Lucene). Hmm but which underlying Lucene version are you using? I don't otherwise know how to configure it -- anyone else? You should also go and vote on the underlying Sun (Oracle!) bug that falsely bottlenecks threads sharing an NIOFSDir on Windows: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6265734 It's been open for almost 5 years now, and is accepted as a bug... Mike On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade <[email protected]> wrote: > I was considering it, but we're already tight on memory usage. How do you > configure Solr to use it? Is this correct? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg28574.html > >> So, start your servlet container with >> -Dorg.apache.lucene.FSDirectory.class=org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDir >> ectory > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: FSDirectory Synchronization Issues > > Try MMapDirectory? > > Mike > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm encountering a lot of contention around >> SimpleFSDirectory$SimpleFSIndexInput.readInternal, pretty much identical to >> what this user described back in 2008: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg15516.html >> >> I also found this JIRA issue, where it appears that the concurrency benefits >> of the NIOReader could not be achieved in Windows due to a bug in the JVM: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753 >> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6265734 >> >> Is this still the case (seems to be based on the above links)? Are there >> other options for reducing this contention in Windows (specifically Windows >> Server 2008 x64)? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Gio. >> >> >> >
