Yeah, thanks for pointing this out. I'm not using any relevancy functions (yet). The data indexed for my app is basically log events. The most relevant events are the newest ones, so sorting by timestamp is enough.
BTW, your book is great ;) -Janne 2010/3/31 Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> > Janne, > Have you found your query relevancy to deteriorate with this setup? > Something to be aware of with distributed searches is that the relevancy of > each Solr core response is based on the local index to that core. So if > you're distributed Solr setup does not distribute documents randomly (as is > certainly the case for you) your relevancy scores will be poor. > > ~ David Smiley > Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/ > > On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Janne Majaranta wrote: > ... > > > > I have tested putting a second solr instance on the same server and > sending > > the updates to that new instance. > > Warming up the new small instance is very fast while the large instance > has > > very hot caches. > ... > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Janne Majaranta > >
