Thanks everyone,
I was following the solrj wiki which says:
"""
If you want to use MultiCore features, then you should use this:
File home = new File( "/path/to/solr/home" );
File f = new File( home, "solr.xml" );
CoreContainer container = new CoreContainer();
container.load( "/path/to/solr/home", f );
EmbeddedSolrServer server = new EmbeddedSolrServer( container, "core name
as defined in solr.xml" );
...
"""
I'm just a little confused with the disconnect between that and what I see
about managing multiple cores here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin . If
someone could provide some high-level directions it would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
-Kallin Nagelberg
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: multicore embedded swap / reload etc.
Embedded supports MultiCore - it's the direct core connection thing
that supports one.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Mar 26, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> But wait... embedded Solr doesn't support multicore, does it? Just
> off memory, I think it's fixed to a single core.
>
> Erik
>
> On Mar 25, 2010, at 10:31 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>
>> All operations through the SolrJ work exactly the same against the
>> Solr web app and embedded Solr. You code the calls to update cores
>> with the same SolrJ APIs either way.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Nagelberg, Kallin
>> <knagelb...@globeandmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've got a situation where I need to reindex a core once a day. To
>>> do this I was thinking of having two cores, one 'live' and one
>>> 'staging'. The app is always serving 'live', but when the daily
>>> index happens it goes into 'staging', then staging is swapped into
>>> 'live'. I can see how to do this sort of thing over http, but I'm
>>> using an embedded solr setup via solrJ. Any suggestions on how to
>>> proceed? I could just have two solrServer's built from different
>>> coreContainers, and then swap the references when I'm ready, but I
>>> wonder if there is a better approach. Maybe grab a hold of the
>>> CoreAdminHandler?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kallin Nagelberg
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lance Norskog
>> goks...@gmail.com
>
