P.S. although phrase queries with fields that do NOT
have stopwords removed feels kinda like what you're
hinting at.

Erick

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think you need to back up and tell us what you're
> trying to accomplish from a higher level.
> See Hossman's apache page:
>
> Your question appears to be an "XY Problem" ... that is: you are dealing
>
> with "X", you are assuming "Y" will help you, and you are asking about "Y"
> without giving more details about the "X" so that we can understand the
> full issue.  Perhaps the best solution doesn't involve "Y" at all?
>
> See Also: http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=542341
>
> Erick
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Christopher Ball <
> christopher.b...@metaheuristica.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I don't see how the KeywordTokenizerFactory could work
>> given
>> the field in question is delimited text (paragraphs) and the
>> KeywordTokenizerFactory essentially does nothing to the inbound content.
>>
>>
>>
>> Feel like I must be missing something . . . but can't figure out what.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do I really need to write a custom analyzer for this?
>>
>>
>>
>>  _____
>>
>> From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> Subject Re: Index an entire
>> Phrase and not it's constituent parts? Date Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:55:58 GMT
>>
>> Try KeywordTokenizerFactory. This page is very useful:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
>>
>> HTH
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters>Erick
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Ball <
>> christopher.b...@metaheuristica.com> wrote:
>>
>> > How can I Index an entire Phrases and not it's constituent parts?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I want to index collations as a single term in the index, and not as the
>> > multiple terms that comprise the phrase, for example, I want to index:
>> "as
>> > much as" but not the independent parts: "as", "much", "as".
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Any guidance appreciated,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Christopher
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to