Hi Lance, I created a new fieldtype with solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory class in analyser and it worked for me. Thanks for all your help.
Regards, Uma Lance Norskog-2 wrote: > > After you change the schema.xml file, you have to rebuild the index > completely. At that point, g_number fields should not be stemmed. > > You can examine what these text field types do. > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#My_search_returns_too_many_.2BAC8_too_little_.2BAC8_unexpected_results.2C_how_to_debug.3F > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch05_5.9?q=analysis.jsp > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Solr user <uma.ravind...@yahoo.co.in> > wrote: >> >> Hi Sergey, >> >> In schema.xml, i have got by default >> >> <!-- A general unstemmed text field - good if one does not know the >> language of the field -->^M >> <fieldType name="textgen" class="solr.TextField" >> positionIncrementGap="100">^M >> <analyzer type="index">^M >> <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>^M >> <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" >> words="stopwords.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" />^M >> <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" >> generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" caten >> ateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="0"/>^M >> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>^M >> </analyzer>^M >> <analyzer type="query">^M >> <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>^M >> <filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt" >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>^M >> <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"^M >> ignoreCase="true"^M >> words="stopwords.txt"^M >> enablePositionIncrements="true"^M >> />^M >> <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" >> generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="0" caten >> ateNumbers="0" catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="0"/>^M >> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>^M >> </analyzer>^M >> </fieldType>^M >> >> >> and i added following entry in schema.xml file, >> >> <field name="g_number" type="textgen" indexed="true" stored="true"/> >> >> But it didnt help. Still the texts are not in original format. Correct me >> if >> i am wrong. >> >> Regards, >> Uma >> >> Sergey Pavlikovskiy wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> probably, it's because of stemming >>> if you need unstemmed text you can use 'textgen' data type for the field >>> >>> Sergey >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Solr user >>> <uma.ravind...@yahoo.co.in>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am new to Solr. I found facets fields does not reflect the original >>>> string in the record. For example, >>>> >>>> the returned xml is, >>>> >>>> - <doc> >>>> <str name="g_number">G-EUPE</str> >>>> </doc> >>>> - <lst name="facet_counts"> >>>> <lst name="facet_queries" /> >>>> - <lst name="facet_fields"> >>>> - <lst name="g_number"> >>>> <int name="gupe">1</int> >>>> </lst> >>>> </lst> >>>> - <lst name="facet_dates" /> >>>> </lst> >>>> >>>> Here, "G-EUPE" is displayed under facet field as 'gupe' where it is not >>>> capital and missing '-' from the original string. Is there any way we >>>> could >>>> fix this to match the original text in record? Thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> uma >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://old.nabble.com/index-of-facet-fields-are-not-same-as-original-string-tp27353838p27353838.html >>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/index-of-facet-fields-are-not-same-as-original-string-tp27353838p27364887.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Lance Norskog > goks...@gmail.com > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/index-of-facet-fields-are-not-same-as-original-string-tp27353838p27392314.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
