Nope. The problem is that SOLR needs to create a ranked
list. It has to search the entire corpus every time. There's
always the possibility that the very last document examined
would rank highest.

So the search times should be unchanged, no matter how
many rows you return, but the time to assemble and transmit
the return packet will vary.

HTH
Erick

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Gora Mohanty <g...@srijan.in> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Does specifying a smaller number of rows, e.g., with
> q=test&start=0&rows=XX affect the query efficiency?
> I realise, of course, that increasing the number of
> rows will lead to inefficiencies in data transfer.
> This is with a standard Solr setup, without sharding,
> etc.
>
> Seems like a newbie query, but I cannot seem to find
> documentation on it, nor did my experiments with measuring
> search times show any definitive results.
>
> Regard,
> Gora
>

Reply via email to